RealBlackStuff wrote:All that those boardviews show are rectangles and dots, no matter how big you try to make them. I don't see any connections, any part-numbers, any text, any indication what a particular rectangle might be.ĭouble-clicking on a dot marks it with a random(?) number, no idea where to go from there.Have you not thought about exploring what the various menu options are? If you can see the board view, then you at least know how to open a file. From there, about the only thing that can go wrong is that you overwrite, if the program allows it, the data file. To prevent that, simply work on a copy of the original file. In any event, hovering over the icons under the menu line will tell you what they do. If there's a hotkey associated with the action, it's also displayed. From left to right:Īll of these actions should all be self-explanatory. BDV TopTest BoardVIew R3 LANDREX TEST LINK(Old) ver:1.0 LANDREX TEST LINK(New) ver:2.2 OPEN BOARD Viewer R7.3 OpenBoard Viewer OpenBoardView-0.4.0-win32 Allegro Free Physical Viewer V15.7 Allegro Free Physical Viewer Ver:16.6 New Board. The board view program is used with the associated schematic diagram as the part numbers and signal names are embedded into the. New boardview software download P5g41t-m lx 1.02 boardview software download BoardViewer HONHAN. BDV file matches the schematic sometimes there's different motherboards used in the same model. An example would be one system using Intel graphics, versus another that uses ATI. Open the file and use the Find/Find Component Part (or hotkey D) to enter U42.
Why "U42"? That's the part name used in the schematic. Use the Find/Find Net (By Net Name) command and enter smb_data in the first line (caps not sensitive). There's two other lines that you can also specify that will be in GREEN or ORANGE. This allows you to enter up to three signal paths and they will be shown as the related colors. The proposed model can be used to predict system performance either off-line or in real-time.Click the FIND button and you should see several items now displayed in red. It is not as resource intensive as micro simulation models, while it can efficiently address the drawbacks of macro-scale analytical models and complex discrete algebraic models. The proposed Train Following Model is generic and can be developed based on readily available historical train tracking data. line throughput and train knock-on delays) are explored. Based on the model developed, the impacts of factors such as service frequency, headway variations, passenger demand, and initial train delays on line performance (i.e. The results indicate that it accurately represents train operations under both normal and disrupted conditions. We validate the proposed model using data from the Red Line of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). the trajectory of an initial train and dispatching headways of following trains from the terminal station). The Train Following Model is applied recursively block by block estimating train trajectories given initial conditions (i.e. In this paper we introduce a mesoscopic Train Following Model which accurately captures train interactions and predicts delays based on spacing between consecutive trains.
0 kommentar(er)
